 
 
 
 
 
   
Definitions. 
 of a ring
 of a ring  is called prime if whenever
 is called prime if whenever 
 for
 for  , then
, then  or
 or  (or both).
 (or both).
 is called irreducible if for any 
decomposition
 is called irreducible if for any 
decomposition 
 of
 of  into a union of two subvarieties, 
either
 into a union of two subvarieties, 
either  or
 or  .  In other words, there are no non-trivial 
decompositions of
.  In other words, there are no non-trivial 
decompositions of  into smaller varieties.
 into smaller varieties.
 is irreducible iff its ideal
 is irreducible iff its ideal
 is prime.
 is prime.
Thus, there exists a one-to-one correspondence between the set of 
varieties 
 and the set of prime (homogeneous if 
projective
 and the set of prime (homogeneous if 
projective  ) ideals
) ideals 
 in the corresponding polynomial
ring.
 in the corresponding polynomial
ring.
![$ I\subset
K[x_1,...,x_n]$](img12.gif) is uniquely
expressible as a finite intersection of prime ideals
 is uniquely
expressible as a finite intersection of prime ideals  with
with 
 for
 for  . Equivalently, any
variety
. Equivalently, any
variety  can be uniquely expressed as a finite union of irreducible
subvarieties
 can be uniquely expressed as a finite union of irreducible
subvarieties  with
 with 
 for
 for
 .
.
The varieties  appearing in this unique decomposition
are called the irreducible components of
 appearing in this unique decomposition
are called the irreducible components of  .
. 
Definition. Let  be a set of points in some 
space.  A topology on
 be a set of points in some 
space.  A topology on  is a set
 is a set 
 of designated 
subsets of
 of designated 
subsets of  , called the open sets of
, called the open sets of  , so that the 
following axioms are satisfied:
, so that the 
following axioms are satisfied:
 and
 and  are open.
 are open.
The closed sets in  are the complements of the
open sets.
 are the complements of the
open sets.
We define below the so-called Zariski topology on 
algebraic varieties.  If we work over 
 , every variety can 
be roughly viewed as a complex manifold
, every variety can 
be roughly viewed as a complex manifold  (with the exception 
of a proper subset of its singular points).  Through its 
embedding in, say,
 (with the exception 
of a proper subset of its singular points).  Through its 
embedding in, say, 
 ,
,  will inherit the usual complex analytic topology from
 will inherit the usual complex analytic topology from 
 - a basis for the open 
sets on
 - a basis for the open 
sets on  will consist of the intersections of
 will consist of the intersections of  with any finite 
balls in
 with any finite 
balls in 
 .
.
The Zariski topology is a different kind of topology. A basis for the open sets in
 is given by the sets
 is given by the sets
 
 ranges over polynomials (homogeneous if projective
 ranges over polynomials (homogeneous if projective  ).
).
 .
.
Exercise. Show that the Zariski topology on the 
projective line 
 is different from the
analytic topology of
 is different from the
analytic topology of 
 .
.
Many statements in algebraic geometry are true for general points on varieties, i.e. if
 is a variety and
 is a variety and  is an 
open dense set of
 is an 
open dense set of  , then any point
, then any point  is called a general point on
 is called a general point on  .  (If
.  (If  is irreducible, then any nonempty open 
set will be dense.  This, in particular, makes Zariski topology a non-Housdorff topology - in the latter, one needs for any two points 
of
 is irreducible, then any nonempty open 
set will be dense.  This, in particular, makes Zariski topology a non-Housdorff topology - in the latter, one needs for any two points 
of  to have two nonintersecting open sets containing each one of 
the points.  This confirms once again that the Zariski topology is 
much coarser than the analytic topology.)
 to have two nonintersecting open sets containing each one of 
the points.  This confirms once again that the Zariski topology is 
much coarser than the analytic topology.)
 
 
 
 
