Let be a field. We shall work over , meaning,
our coefficients of polynomials and other scalars will lie in .
Definitions.
Projective varieties can be thought of as ``completions'',
``compactifications'', or ``closures'' of affine varieties. Their
global properties are usually easier to describe than those
of affine varieties. Conversely, affine varieties can be thought of as
building blocks of projective varieties (indeed, they constitute
an open cover), and hence local properties are easier to describe
using affine varieties. However, projective varieties vary ``nicely''
in families and hence parametrizing and moduli spaces are usually
constructed for projective varieties with certain defining common
properties.
We construct maps bewteen the set of all varieties over and the set of all ideals by sending
For any ideal
(not necessarily
radical), we consider
- a variety, and then take
. It is evident that will be a radical
ideal containing , but is it going to be ? To
paraphrase the problem, start with being a radical ideal and take
. Is this equal to ?
The answer in general is no. For example, if
is the ground field, and
is the ideal
generated by the single polynomial
in the affine
plane, then is obviously radical ( is irreducible), and the
zero locus of is
- just one point. However, the
ideal of is definitely much larger than - it consists of
all polynomials vanishing at , i.e. having no free terms:
. Thus, we end up with a (radical)
ideal bigger than the original.
The above situation is possible because
is not
an algebraically closed field. This leads to the famous Nullstelensatz, a basic theorem in commutative algebra, on which much
of algebraic geometry over algebraically closed fields is based.
Note that the radical of the unit ideal is again the unit ideal: . This implies the following corollary:
Some other ``strange'' things happen over fields, which are not algebraically closed. For example, we would like to call a ``planar curve'' any variety in which is given by 1 polynomial. However, over , the ``curve'' defined by is really just a point, while over (or any algebraically closed fields) it is a pair of intersecting lines. Thus, many interesting and intuitive properties of algebraic varieties hold only over algebraically closed fields.
There is an analog of Nullstelensatz for projective varieties
(for
, of course.) There is one subtle point, though.
We call
the irrelevant ideal in
. Note that is radical, and that
. Yet, is not the whole ideal of
:
, the unit ideal, is the ideal of
. Thus, we have two radical ideals competing for the
:
. The bigger one ``wins'',
because
, and we state the Nullstelensatz as
follows:
Note further that for a (homogeneous) ideal , iff or . In both cases, , which can be shown to imply for some .