The title of this talk is the same as the title of the book [1] by Ivan
Niven published
by the Mathematical Association of America in the Dolciani Series. It is
written as
exposition at a level for undergraduate students and I recommend it to you
if you want to look
more closely at the subject of the talk today and related topics. My list of
references at
the end of the book is not complete. There is a vast list of articles and
books compiled in
this book by Niven and you should go there first. Although I knew that many
problems in calculus
had been solved before calculus was invented, I had no idea of the wide
variety of problems
that one sees in every calculus book among the exercises that can be solved
with just a few
techniques. I remember solving them as a student and now I assign them as a
teacher. However, I
do point out to my classes that there are elementary methods that
often are easier to implement.
Professor Ogilvy has said ``these are `trick methods', each applying solely
to its own problem.
Usually they cannot be extended, lacking the great generality of the
analytic (calculus)
methods.'' For example:
Find the coordinates
where
has a
relative maximum on
.
Niven on the other hand agrees that while calculus is good ``for
solving some problems
in maxima and minima, the method is not universal. There are many problems
that are awkward, if
not impossible, to solve with elementary calculus ... Thus we follow a
simple maxim: If a problem
can be solved more simply with calculus, leave it to calculus.'' Some
examples:
Find the minimum value of
on
.
Find the quadrilateral with the largest area with a given perimeter.